传媒教育网

 找回密码
 实名注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
做个试验
楼主: admin
打印 上一主题 下一主题

微博研究案例集锦

[复制链接]
61#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-9 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
【案例】
@阿甘[url=http://club.weibo.com/intro][/url]:【政务微博影响力之新浪PK腾讯】有关王立军申请休假式治疗的微博,截至中午12时,新浪微博转发27125次,腾讯微博转发2564次。各级政府要开微博,首选还是新浪啊

收起|查看大图|向左转|向右转

转发(3140) | 评论(811) 2月8日12:03 来自新浪微博
62#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-11 18:33:00 | 只看该作者
【案例】
郎心铁看看右边这些人的嘴脸吧! //@宋凭栏V:央视记者很多人都是反人民的, //@侯宁: 张才女此话欠妥。“他们”是谁?为何不明说?说了才算真话嘛,为何吞吞吐吐不说真话?自己带头不说真话,却说“令他们恐惧”!莫非只有张大小姐说的才是真话?不尽然吧,淡定淡定,我们都热爱围脖新媒体。
@搜搜加U站央视张泉灵:【为什么他们会对微博新媒体恨之入骨】不断夸大微博里一些虚假信息影响力,甚至以钓鱼方式造假以证明微博之需被监管?其实他们怕的不是谣言,谣言有什么可怕?言论自由流动的环境里,任何虚假信息都会在交叉比对中失去活性。可怕的其实是真话,而且不受控制,这才是令他们恐惧的!
收起|查看大图|向左转|向右转

转发(1012)
|
评论(323)
今天12:24
来自新浪微博
转发(6)|
收藏|
评论(2)
38分钟前
来自新浪微博
63#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-13 11:01:00 | 只看该作者
【案例】

64#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-21 21:32:46 | 只看该作者
【案例】
郎心铁//@屁民湛江: //@阿瑟king: 心那,瓦凉瓦凉的。//@普法三十年-:再一次感谢郭嘉 //@冷月-孤灯:
@夏商今天,拥400万粉丝的经济学家韩志国退出微博。坊间称,新浪接到了封杀指令。韩迫于压力,体面地主动退出。普及政经常识、粉丝日众、以异见人士面目发言。应是韩被黜主因。前几天某发言人说中国没有异见人士。你们把异见人士都封杀屏蔽驱逐了,当然就没有了。白茫茫中华大地真干净,鸵鸟的太平盛世啊。轉發(2743)
|
評論(737)
今天18:10
來自iPhone客户端
轉發(3)|
收藏|
評論(1)
9分鐘前
來自新浪微博
65#
发表于 2012-3-13 12:38:02 | 只看该作者
【案例】
新闻出版总署署长:给微博提供持续发展渠道

  2012年03月13日08:04  中国广播网

  中广网北京3月13日消息 (记者周文超 刘黎)据中国之声《新闻纵横》报道,昨天中国之声两会特别访谈《做客中央台》的嘉宾是国家新闻出版总署党组书记、署长,国家版权局局长柳斌杰。信息时代,我们的阅读方式发生了怎样的转变?实体书店风光不在,民营书店退出市场,如何保卫我们的精神家园?柳斌杰署长一一解析。

  微博发展的势头是很好的

  网络时代,人人都可以是“记者”,媒体的影响力也超过了以往任何时候,用柳斌杰署长的话说,信息共享成为现实,我们的生活方式也因此改变。微博就是共享信息的一种传播方式,柳斌杰署长在人民网上也开了自己的微博。

  柳斌杰:“微博现在作为交往、传递信息的重要渠道,发展的势头是很好的,目前微博还没有恰当的商业模式,下一步,就整个互联网传播,要探讨互联网经营的模式,给微博或者其他传播的样式提供一种能够持续发展的渠道。”

  书店是一种精神象征 不能消失

  信息技术的进步不仅使得新型的社交工具、信息传播工具层出不穷地涌现,也改变了我们传统的阅读方式。柳斌杰署长每年会读200多本书,现在他不光看纸质书籍,也经常利用电子书编辑、整合、查找的优势扩大阅读范围。技术的进步带来的阅读方式的多元化无可厚非,不过,实体书店的不景气,甚至一些民营书店悄然退出市场,这让很多爱书的人颇感遗憾。

  柳斌杰:“应该能成长起来,因为书店它不光是一个卖书的地方,它往往是一种精神的象征,他是一种情结,不能让它消失。”

  民营书店会在税收方面给予优惠

  数字化阅读分流了读者群,城市建设提速,使得民营书店面临房租价格上升等各种困难,柳斌杰署长表示,会从税收政策等方面给予优惠,留住我们的精神家园。

  柳斌杰:“在出版物、销售方面对它实行减税、免税的政策。第二,在政府的财政方面,给专营图书的民营书店给予适当的补贴。第三还考虑在书店使用房屋的租金方面要出台相应的政策,给提供比较低价的这个房租,使他经营能够维持下去。”

  上市融资不仅仅是经济领域的常用名词,如今,出版传媒产业也走上了上市之路。在此基础上,打造出版传媒行业的航空母舰也正在成为现实,文化产业将成为国民经济的支柱性产业。在新闻出版总署掌门人眼里,文化大发展,会给老百姓的生活带来怎样的变化?

  上市融资使出版传媒企业做强成为可能

  目前,全国120家出版传媒类企业中已有49家上市,上市融资使得出版传媒企业做大做强成为可能。

  柳斌杰:“全国来讲,我们组建5-7家出版传媒的航空母舰的目标接近实现,中央层次上三大集团已经全部组建,这一部分占了我们国家出版的60%。地方上现在涌现出一大批有实力的出版集团,将来地方上也可能出来几个大的集团,这样我们整个航空母舰就基本组成了,组成以后瞄准世界的大集团来继续发展。”

  文化产业将成国民经济支柱产业

  截至去年,文化产业在国民经济中的占比还未超过3%,十二五末,也就是到2016年,这一数据要提升到5%,文化产业将成为国民经济的支柱性产业。

  柳斌杰:“一个作为知识劳动者,他的这个价值会充分的体现出来。社会的文化产品能够满足各方面人士对象化、个性化的阅读或者是享受文艺生活的这种要求。整个中国的文化氛围会发生很大的变化,崇尚知识、崇尚文化。”

http://news.sina.com.cn/m/2012-03-13/080424105640.shtml
66#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-28 09:25:56 | 只看该作者
【案例】
@清华史安斌【数字媒体时代的One-man Newsroom】美国最为知名的“数字记者”(“微博记者”)Andy Carvin一个人撑起美国公共广播电台的国际新闻部,“对我来说,微博不是制作‘融合新闻’的工具,微博就是一个新闻编辑部”。图中他在进行叙利亚报道,他选择了近百个当地微博作为信源进行筛选http://t.cn/zOXj7qp轉發(126)
|
評論(25)
3月27日22:03
來自新浪微博


Carvin’s monitors at NPR are his windows on the nonstop action and analysis of the Arab uprisings, from Tunisia to Oman. (Photos: Mike Janssen.)
@acarvin’s example
Digital journalists look for lessons in work of NPR’s one-man newsroom
Published in Current, March 26, 2012
By Mike Janssen
On a recent afternoon at NPR, Andy Carvin was watching a video of a protest purportedly shot in the Syrian city of Homs, a locus of that country’s uprising against its repressive regime.
The video’s location surprised Carvin, considering the firepower the government has unleashed on the city to quell the uprising. As he often does, he looked for telltale landmarks in the background, listened to the chants and accents of the protesters, and checked if the weather in the video matched the day’s forecasts. He ended up asking his Twitter contact who had disseminated the video for more verification.
This vetting process occupies most of Carvin’s workdays. At first glance it looks much like the daily routine of many journalists, but it’s how Carvin became the talk of journalistic digerati a year ago, when he channeled his social-media savvy as a one-man newsroom covering the Arab Spring’s rolling upheaval.
He kept tabs on the Twitter feeds of hundreds of activists, bloggers and journalists in the countries where revolts ignited. He didn’t just retweet content without comment but vetted it, asking for confirmation, sourcing, more details, playing his followers against each other as if he were an assigning editor of an incorporeal newsroom.
He became a dogged beat reporter, far removed from the scene but covering it at all hours, exposing his messy and complicated process for all to see.
The exhaustive tweeting, which for a stretch occupied him as many as 19 hours a day, seven days a week, made him the equivalent of a household name in digital and media circles. At the South By Southwest conference last year, blogger and media critic Jeff Jarvis proclaimed that “all roads now lead to Andy Carvin.” Rob Bole, formerly v.p. of digital media strategy for CPB, called Carvin a “rock star” and a “visionary.”
Speaking at the Integrated Media Association conference in Austin this month, NPR President Gary Knell said Carvin has “done amazing things. . . . I literally felt I was on the ground at Tahrir Square. We need to be able to do that on the local level as well.”
Yet a year after the Arab Spring, Carvin remains a rare breed. More journalists are using Twitter to find stories and connect with sources, but Carvin says few use it as he does. He sometimes writes for NPR’s website, but his Twitter activity rarely yields full articles. Instead, the nonstop chatter among his networked community serves as both process and product.
“It’s not that I’m just using Twitter and integrating other forms of journalism,” he says. “It’s that I see Twitter as the newsroom where I spend my time.”
Like Knell, promoters of innovation at the intersection of new media and newsgathering want to see Carvin’s techniques and gusto spread more widely — particularly since the futuristic sci-fi solution of cloning Carvin isn’t yet possible. The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation cited Carvin as an inspiration for its latest Knight News Challenge, in which it seeks to fund novel uses of existing digital platforms.
“What could we learn and build out, so that we don’t all have to have Andy’s expertise, background and intensity to do a good job and tell stories from the constant flow of information that we’re now exposed to?” asks John Bracken, director of journalism and media innovation for the Knight Foundation.

“I see Twitter as the newsroom where I spend my time,” says NPR’s Carvin.
From Bhutto to Ben AliThough his documenting of the Arab Spring may seem like a sudden outburst, Carvin explains that it grew from a career of working with new media, blogging, Twitter and the Arab world.
He first became interested in new media’s potential as a teenager in the early ’80s, when he was growing up in Florida and first started using the Internet. Nearby NASA had set up bulletin boards and dial-up services for public use, giving Carvin a leg up on using online communities. “I’m probably the oldest digital native out there,” Carvin says.
His first job out of college was a CPB fellowship for which he created a website about education and the Internet. He continued to focus on digital issues, later serving as director and editor of the Digital Divide Network, a community of citizens and professionals looking for ways to improve access to communication technologies.
That work introduced him to many bloggers, and he got to know the creators of Global Voices, a Boston-based web project that gathers citizen media from all over the world. “He had an enormous number of contacts,” says Ethan Zuckerman, co-founder of Global Voices. That would become essential to the Arab Spring coverage that he would later mount, Zuckerman says.
Carvin joined NPR in 2006 as senior project manager for online communities. The term “social media” wasn’t yet in wide use, and NPR was unsure of its aspirations. Carvin had been working on collaborations between professional and citizen journalists and wanted to extend those efforts. He began assisting with the network’s coverage of the 2008 election and major disasters, such as the earthquakes in Haiti and Japan.
Meanwhile, he was exploring Twitter, which he had joined in 2007. His “aha” moment came when he was stuck at an airport and learned that former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto had been assassinated. Carvin and his Twitter contacts began monitoring news channels and corresponding with people in Pakistan to learn details.
“From that point onwards I started thinking, ‘Okay, I need to experiment with this more,’” he says.
The outbreak of protests in Tunisia in late 2010 caught Carvin by surprise. He had visited the country and was familiar with the nature of the police state there. He began his Twitter onslaught and, when protests began in Egypt, he just kept going. At times he was covering uprisings in half a dozen countries at once, tweeting into the wee hours of the morning, grabbing a few hours of sleep and diving in again.
“It was thrilling to watch what he was doing and to watch the events unfold,” says Jane McDonnell, executive director of the Online News Association. “But, also, the way that he shared it with folks was really inspiring.”
Freedom to experiment — and errIn the early days of his Twitter frenzy, only NPR’s Foreign Desk and some of its breaking-news bloggers knew what Carvin was doing. His higher-ups started paying attention only when he began to draw attention from other websites and publications.
Although he had abandoned his work of managing NPR’s Facebook presence to cover the uprisings, no one questioned what he was doing. One executive said to him, “I don’t understand what you’re doing, but please keep doing it.”
NPR’s willingness to give their chief tweeter free rein is often overlooked, say Carvin and other digital-news advocates, and they regard it as key to his success. “I can’t think of any other news organization that would not only have done that, but that wouldn’t have fired me for neglecting my official duties,” Carvin says. “The latitude that NPR has given me has been absolutely extraordinary.”
“You can’t actually figure these things out without a lot of time and trial and error and falterings,” says Jay Rosen, a media critic and journalism professor at New York University. “And when you aren’t given that time, it’s really hard.”
Such experimentation is not without risk. Carvin sparked debate in February when he retweeted a link to a gruesome video of Syrian children maimed in violence amid the rebellion. Some readers and colleagues said it went too far. Carvin and others responded that he gave fair warning about the nature of the video, and that his followers had already opted in to his content, in a sense, by following his feed.
And when Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot near Tucson, Ariz., last year, Carvin and others at the network mistakenly reported that she had been killed. The network quickly retracted the news, but not before the tweet had been retweeted numerous times.
“One response for a pre-Internet news organization might have been to throw their hands up in the air and shut down the Andy Carvin Experiment,” says Bracken of the Knight Foundation. “They put new policies in place, but they didn’t turn off Andy Carvin. And I think that’s a really important point.”
Carvin’s Twitter experience has given him ideas for innovations he’d like to see, of the sort that could stem from the Knight Foundation initiative. He wants tools for verifying information more rapidly and for analyzing how sources connect to each other, which might help journalists assess the credibility of social-media sources more quickly.
He also needs help winnowing the many messages he gets from his Twitter audience, which on some days can climb to 2,000.
“I would love to have some form of tool that serves as triage for those @replies,” he says, “so I know that these are the people who are likely to be most credible . . . so that I have the ability to whitelist or blacklist people and see their degrees of separation from each other — all sorts of factors like that to help expedite the process.”
Yet, ultimately, the crucial ingredient may be something no algorithm will ever duplicate. “It still boils down to judgment,” Carvin says.
How’s that cloning technology coming along?
Comments, questions, tips? [email protected]

Copyright 2012 American University


http://current.org/tech/tech1206carvin.html
67#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-29 07:59:30 | 只看该作者
[案例]
微博谣传“一孩子眼角膜被摘” 博主受1月禁言
2012-03-29 03:53:40 来源: 新京报(北京) 有0人参与


“平安北京”发布的辟谣微博。网络截屏

网友发布的不实信息。
本报讯   “丢失的孩子几天后出现……但眼角膜被摘了。”昨天,网上传出该微博后,引发众多网友恐慌。
北京警方称该微博为谣言。“微博辟谣”表示,暂停该用户一个月的微博发布功能。
博主承认“道听途说”
昨天10时,网友“的子”发微博称,“什么世道!什么世道!同事老公的同事的孩子,前几天爷爷奶奶带着出去玩的时候丢了!几天后孩子又出现在小区门口,兜里装了6000块钱,眼睛直愣愣的,一查,眼角膜被摘了……”此事是在“北京发生的”。
该微博一出,即引发6000余网友转发,网友表现出紧张和恐慌。
有网友大呼恐怖,谴责“摘孩子眼角膜”的行为。也有网友认为“同事老公的同事”交待模糊,更有网友表示该微博为谣言。
昨日12时,“的子”的该微博突然被删除。随后,其发微博称:“今早发的微博纯属朋友间道听途说,当时出于一位妈妈的本能,我通过微博表达了自己的想法,对于给任何人带来的困扰和烦恼,一并致歉。”
网友谴责“造假博主”
昨天,北京警方通过“平安北京”称,经相关部门调查核实,近期110报警服务台未接报此类警情,该网友已承认消息不实并向大家道歉,并自行删除了相关微博文章。警方提醒网友,不要轻信或者传播类似的不实信息,以免造成不必要的恐慌。
“微博辟谣”称,经与该用户反复沟通,该用户无法提供准确消息来源,且警方也确认无此情况。因此,对该用户进行暂停发布功能1个月的处罚。
在博主道歉、警方辟谣、作出处罚后,仍有网友谴责博主“未经证实就散布谣言”的行为。
“停发1个月的处罚显然过轻。“moonzhouwu”评价。
昨晚,“的子”认证微博已改名,并删除所有已发微博。
解析
“多分析思考,可避免盲目听信”
北京同仁医院眼科主任医师潘志强表示,从医学角度讲,这篇微博的内容是不可信的。
潘志强称,如果人的眼角膜被摘除了,其视网膜,虹膜晶体及玻璃体都会流出来。也就是说,眼角膜没有了,眼球也就没有了。“眼眶就是黑洞洞的,怎么可能‘眼睛直愣愣的"。而且眼球整体摘除,需要至少十天以上的恢复,怎么可能“几天后又出现。”
潘志强建议,网友看到类似微博时,要从科学的角度多思考多分析,不要盲目相信,避免不必要的恐慌。
说法
严重者将面临行政处罚
“这条谣言,对于很多没有辨识力的网友,将会产生恐慌情绪。”力珉律师事务所麻增伟律师表示,网友发不实消息微博,如产生恶劣的后果,会因涉嫌扰乱社会公共秩序,面临行政处罚。
麻增伟介绍,散布谣言,谎报险情、疫情、警情或者以其他方法故意扰乱公共秩序的,根据有关规定,可被处以五日以下拘留或者五百元以下罚款的行政处罚,情节严重的,可被处五日以上十日以下拘留,可以并处五百元以下罚款的行政处罚。如果构成刑事犯罪的,将被依法追究刑事责任。如果发布的虚假信息侵害公民、企业的名誉权、隐私权、商业信誉或其他民事权利的,受害人可依法要求散布人承担相应的赔偿责任。

http://news.163.com/12/0329/03/7TO2A7SL00011229.html

68#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-31 13:15:52 | 只看该作者
【案例】
@徐昕【锤子政策】CCTV到四川和重庆釆访微博关闭评论有什么感想? 群众: “可以说家乡话不?”记者:“可以的。” 群众:“不晓得哪个瓜娃子哈麻批想出来嘞这个锤子政策,他懂个铲铲啊,日他仙人板板!~”记者问道:“这个是什么意思呢?”群众:“就是关得好,不关白不关。”
#冷笑话#
@慧质兰心_


轉發(227)
|
評論
59分鐘前
來自新浪微博
轉發|
收藏|
評論
27分鐘前
來自新浪微博
69#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-31 17:41:46 | 只看该作者
【案例】
@杰人微语新浪和腾讯的微博评论被关,搜狐微博则一切正常。刚和搜狐一位高层通电话,我问他:搜狐为什么没有趁机打广告拉客?他的回答让我肃然起敬,他说,这次变化是微博界的大事,是微博用户的共同损失,在这个问题上,我们要坚守道义底线,决不能趁火打劫。轉發(18311)
|
評論
今天09:21
來自新浪微博
70#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-31 19:17:07 | 只看该作者
【案例】
@残夜孤月【腾讯新闻】据新华英文消息,北京警方今日证实,已逮捕1065名涉嫌编造传播谣言者,删除网上20.8万余条有害信息。此前已有6人因在网上编造谣言被拘留,一批传播谣言的网站被查处。http://t.cn/zOSVEhX
收起|查看大圖|向左轉|向右轉

轉發(285)
|
評論
28分鐘前
來自新浪微博
Beijing arrests 1,000 in Internet crime crackdown
English.news.cn 2012-03-31 18:07:52
Xinhua Weibo
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Diigo
Delicious
Digg
Linkedin
MySpace
Sina Weibo
Kaixin
Renren
Q-zone
Tencent Weibo
Sohu Weibo
NetEase Weibo





BEIJING, March 31 (Xinhua) -- Beijing police on Saturday said they have arrested 1,065 suspects and deleted more than 208,000 "harmful" online messages as part of an intensive nationwide crackdown on Internet-related crimes conducted since mid-February.
The operators of more than 3,117 websites have received related warnings, a spokesman from the city police's cybersecurity department said Saturday, adding that 70 Internet companies that defied the warnings have received administrative punishments, including forced closures.
The spokesman said the campaign, dubbed "Spring Breeze," mainly targets the dissemination of information related to smuggling firearms, drugs and toxic chemicals, as well as the sale of human organs, the counterfeiting certificates and invoices and trade in personal information.
The crackdown is meant to address prominent public complaints about Internet-related crimes, the spokesman said, adding that reports about Internet-related crimes have gone down 50 percent since the campaign was launched on Feb. 14.
The spokesman urged Internet users to actively oppose the spread of harmful information.
China has stepped up its efforts to "cleanse" cyberspace over the past few weeks. Beijing police on Friday announced the detention of six people for allegedly fabricating and spreading rumors on the Internet, as well as punishment for websites and social media that carried the rumors.
Sixteen websites were subsequently forced to close, and the country's two largest microblog operators -- Sina Weibo and Tencent -- have suspended commenting functions on their sites from March 31 to April 3.
A Tencent statement said the move was made to prevent illicit information from spreading through microblog posts.

Editor: Lu Hui

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-03/31/c_131501455.htm

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 实名注册

本版积分规则

掌上论坛|小黑屋|传媒教育网 ( 蜀ICP备16019560号-1

Copyright 2013 小马版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2016-2022 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表