传媒教育网

 找回密码
 实名注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
做个试验
楼主: admin
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新闻客观性案例集锦

[复制链接]
171#
发表于 2020-4-26 16:24:36 | 只看该作者
案例
红星新闻记者回应人民日报报道:强烈谴责,深以为耻!




很多人问,还是统一回复下:
首先,个人对人民日报河南频道单信源不实报道强烈谴责。媒体的责任在还原真相,但人民日报河南频道的几位记者从未联系我与剑强。改写当地宣传部门通稿后就发布洗地文章,这样的操作配不上记者二字。同行中出现如此所谓记者,深以为耻。
1.关于所谓假记者。我是持证记者,剑强所发稿件我均有参与,并且署名。而且若真要依有无记者证来论真假记者,那像胡锡进所说,目前一线记者中有大量无证人员。这种现状谁之过?
2.记者采访时抽烟,是习惯问题,被恶意放大,卑鄙无耻。所谓挑衅工作人员更是无稽之谈。记者采访被不明身份人员无故阻拦,数次询问对方身份未果。剑强拍照时,其他记者提醒他,他想抢你手机,剑强顺口说了两次,“他抢我手机试试”,有视频为证。
3.篡改笔录内容,于法不容。作为受害者,专门去做了长达6个小时的笔录,难道是特意否认自己被打?为原阳洗地?比如,“我感觉背后有人捶我,但我不确定是谁”被掐头去尾改成了“我不确定(暗示不确定有没有人打我)”。
4.剑强为何卷入其中?目前公开的所有视频并没有剑强被打的视频。其中一位记者拍下了剑强被打画面,但因手机被夺走、刷机,无法找回。当天真实情况是,新京报记者突破不明身份人员进入陵园被发现,被多人掐脖、反扣时,剑强上前录视频,保留证据。对方见状,涌来数人暴力抢夺手机。保护手机过程中,剑强确有被打,衣服被撕破、眼镜也掉在了地上。手机落地后,剑强准备去捡,熟料被一名政府工作人员一脚踹开,然后捡走。
5.对方涉嫌刑事犯罪。上游记者的手机也被暴力抢夺。此后,两部手机均被暴力刷机,剑强的是华为手机,刷机后可开机,但操作异常。上游的是苹果系统,暴力刷机致无法开机,成砖头一块。二人全部采访资料、个人材料均被暴力删除。这涉嫌破坏计算机信息系统罪。
6.原阳将阻止记者采访的理由甩锅给疫情。经南方周末记者求证,洗地文中所称,原阳县民政部门4月1日在公墓门口张贴告示:“非本公墓安葬逝者直系家属一律不得入内,入园祭祀的每个家庭不得超过2人”仅针对4月4日至6日清明假期。而且,有录音可证实,记者进入陵园前已征得部分家属同意,这点南方周末也已证实。
7.在场人员均未表明身份,无故拦路。当地政府派十几人横在路中,就是为阻拦记者采访。原阳县融媒体中心总监制是原阳县委宣传部副部长卞瑞锋,冲突发生时,他们的人就在现场,但就是不表明身份。当时,如果他们表明身份,说明阻拦理由,还有后面的事吗?
上面7点仅是我起床后梳理,还有很多点后续会统一整理。




来源:微信公众号 媒联社


编辑:贾梦琪





172#
发表于 2020-6-23 21:36:14 | 只看该作者
【案例】
左媒不想让你看到的6/20川普集会(照片与视频)
疫情之后的川普集会激动人心!
06/20/2020 晚上8点在俄克拉荷马川普的拉力集会,百万人报名,只有两万人可以入场,许多人一个星期前就在那里安营扎寨了,估计场外搭台可容集五万人。从现场直播可以看到,组织者给每人发口罩,量体温,您可以目睹挺川战友的文明礼貌和爱国热情。
总统发推文说:沉默的大多数比以往如何时候都更加强壮
看看黑人的喜乐从心底发出:
视频链接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bq9QH_l2h_MriBfI8lmEQQ
“黑人支持川普之声”说,我们来了!
再看看这些无廉耻心的霸凌帮,故意挑衅参与者并阻挡人们进入会区。华盛顿时报报道,因为他们的骚扰,川普总统和彭斯副总统决定取消室外演讲。
川普总统早在一天前发推特警告过他们:我想对所有这些抗议者,扰乱者,抢劫者,和卑鄙行事者们说,你们必须明白,你们决定来俄克拉荷马集会区闹事的话,必定不会得到像纽约,西雅图,或明尼阿波利斯的待遇。这里将是一个非常不一样的情景!
川普总统在集会上谈及关于焚烧国旗的提案得到了热烈的反响!“任何人如果故意焚烧美国国旗,将被判处一年监禁!”
前司法部长杰夫.赛深在拉力集会后发推特大力赞扬川普总统:
川普总统今天的演讲展现出惊人的驱动力!
他对美国伟大的建国历史和思想理念的清晰程度
可谓是大师级的!
无拘无束!充满得胜的信息!!
拜登绝对无法匹敌,来较量吧!
门可罗雀的拜登集会
川普拉力集会在经历了三个多月的疫情禁闭后第一次重新启动,在爱国志士们的参与中圆满结束,可谓史诗性的大篇章!
相信川普总统将继续不懈地为你我争战
(川普总统讲话视频节选)
来源:微信公众号北美保守评论
链接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bq9QH_l2h_MriBfI8lmEQQ
编辑:宋婷

6.png (200.08 KB, 下载次数: 29)

6.png

1.png (372.46 KB, 下载次数: 29)

1.png
173#
发表于 2020-6-23 21:48:04 | 只看该作者
【案例】
又有四家中国媒体被制裁,且看胡总编如何反击
622日美国宣布将中央电视台(CCTV)、中新社、人民日报和环球时报的驻美业务定性为外国使团!美国发言人发表声明说:“国务院是基于“外国使团法”所授予的权威做出的决定。将这些实体定性的决定不是基于这些实体制作的内容,也不是对这些被定性的实体在美国可以发表什么施加限制。只是承认他们的本质!”在此逆旅代表胡总编对美国干涉新闻自由的做法表示强烈谴责!
那么什么是“外国使团法”呢?该法律颁布于1982年,根据法律规定,媒体机构一旦被列入“外国使团”就意味着这些媒体就不再享有某些自由。这些媒体的从业者不论是不是美国公民,他们都必须向美国国务院提交雇员的个人信息,以及在美工作人员的流动情况,包括新聘或离职情况。这些新闻机构还须向美国国务院登记机构报告,该机构是否在美拥有或租赁资产,而且在今后购买或租赁新的房产时,必须事先获得美国政府批准。被指定的外国使团的实体必须像驻美外国使馆和领事馆一样遵守某些行政规定,但是又不享有外交人员的一些特权。
早在今年218日,美国国务院已经把新华社、中国环球电视网(CGTN)、中国国际广播电台(CRI)、《中国日报》(China Daily)和《人民日报》海外版的美国总代理海天发展公司列入外国使团名单,理由是这些实体都直接受命于政府,都属于官方宣传体系中的一部分,并不是独立的新闻媒体。
作为报复,中国以《华尔街时报》一篇评论文章抹黑中国为理由,驱逐了三名记者!
3月,美国又决定把中国官媒在美分支机构的工作人员人数限制,从160人削减到100人,5月,在非美国的新闻媒体工作的中国记者工作签证将被限制在90天,可以申请延期,延期期限也只有90天。
面对美国的所作所为,中国政府随后宣布撤销《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》和《华盛顿邮报》的几乎所有美国记者在中国境内采访的资格。
近两年,中美关系进入了前所未有的低谷,双方的拉锯战已经延伸到包括媒体在内的各个方面。这里不得不提一个人,中国目前第一网红,环球时报总编辑胡锡进。胡总编不仅在国内发声,也积极转战国外媒体阵地,在退特上坚持发出自己的声音,每个中国人都应该支持胡主编,希望有朝一日我们都可以像胡主编一样上退特,坚决支持胡主编。这次胡主编所在的“环球时报”也上了使团名单,我想这正是对胡主编坚持发出自己的声音的一种褒奖,说明美国已经意识到了胡主编这个强大的对手,不得不使出下三滥的手段来制衡。估计今天胡主编会就此事谴责美国,我们拭目以待吧!
逆旅给大家推荐一本书,这本书“如乘坐一辆老旧但真实的时光穿梭列车,摇晃着前往那只有黑与白交替的时代,期间一个个灵秀的面庞,熟悉的名字,纷纷从我身边穿梭而过,给我讲述着他们的傲慢与狗苟。”这本书是一场声势浩大的永别,也是一代知识精英的家国痛史,他就是前几年非常火,不得不阉割的的一本书《南渡北归》未被阉割版,值得收藏!点击下面链接,或者阅读原文购买,货到付款!
新闻联播和教科书永远不会告诉你的:那一场声势浩大的永别,终于可以说了
来源:微信公众号—新逆旅苦行人
链接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/RH3wNabCjcdd3Wo4mnim3A
编辑:宋婷

174#
发表于 2020-7-26 20:15:02 | 只看该作者
【案例】
在新闻世界中,您知道观点文章和新闻报道之间有什么区别吗
在新闻世界中,您知道观点文章和新闻报道之间有什么区别吗?波因特学院列举出两者的一些主要特征:
观点文章
•主张某一种观点
•或使用第一人称叙事,即“我”或“我们”
•更具个人色彩,包括个人轶事
•标签为:观点文章,社论,评论或分析
新闻报道
•提出各种观点
•不会只主张一种观点
•包含可观察和可验证的事实
•通常以第三人称“他们”来叙事
•使用诸如“他说”或“她解释道”之类的短语将文章中的观点归属于某些消息来源
https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2020/opinion-news-or-editorial-readers-often-cant-tell-the-difference/
In the news world, can you tell the difference between an opinion piece and a news article? Poynter Institute listed out some of the main characteristics of both:
Opinion pieces
•        Promote a single viewpoint
•        May use first person - "I" or "we"
•        More personal tone, including anecdotes
•        Labeled as: opinion, editorial, review or analysis
News articles
•        Present a variety of viewpoints
•        Don't advocate for one viewpoint
•        Contains observable & verifiable facts
•        Typically written in third person - "they" or "them"
•        Attribute opinions to sources, using phrases such as "he said" or "she explained"
来源:微信公众号—美国驻华大使馆
链接:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nMMCOwMZOesOvXEy1F-Aag
编辑:宋婷

175#
发表于 2020-8-13 18:20:26 | 只看该作者
案例】

编辑:刘佳莹

176#
发表于 2020-9-18 22:15:31 | 只看该作者
【案例】
纽约时报中文版篡改采访内容

A@B很好奇,纽时中文版提到你的名字,是你吗?还是同名同姓?
B:是的。我什么时候说孩子在伯克利读书了。这是当时采访的记录,我明明说我两儿子支持Trump。可以看出他们的采访都是有套路的。所以,这些媒体里有公正。
A:很多年前,我爸妈在美国闲着没事干,听说华人游行抗议钓鱼岛还是什么的,我就带他们去凑热闹了。有一个世界日报的记者釆访了我爸,隔天世界日报登出来了,名字年龄和在国内工作单位等都对,但引用的话全然不是我爸讲。从此我对媒体有了戒心。
B:刚刚记者跟我联系了,说抱歉。编辑把她的原文改了,说黑人和少数族裔看了会不高兴。改以前的版本估计这记者不敢给我,要丢饭碗的。她告诉,都被编辑删了。
C:這些人如此無恥,難怪有人會懷疑民主黨支持者做票。
D:照他这个逻辑,那还采访干什么,编辑可以随便乱改歪曲事实。
E@B赞有勇气,讲真话。对媒体公认串改谈话记录,感到羞耻,太无耻了,更加坚定了 我不看所谓的主流媒体的决心
F@B去告他们,篡改采访
B:赔不起时间和精力。
编辑:刘佳莹

177#
发表于 2020-9-27 01:18:13 | 只看该作者
【案例】


编辑:宋婷

178#
发表于 2020-10-31 14:11:28 | 只看该作者
【案例】

“特朗普要连任 除非1个地方被雷劈2次” 然后特朗普大厦被劈了3次

原标题:“他要连任,除非1个地方被雷劈2次”,然后特朗普大厦被劈了3次…
周弋博
一个地方两次被雷劈的概率有多低?
据美国联邦应急管理局估计,美国人平均遭雷击的概率为六十万分之一。
如果每次被雷劈是独立事件,那么被劈中两次的概率,比中五百万还要低两万倍……
当地时间10月20日,《华尔街日报》发表了一篇题为《特朗普要连任,除非一个地方两次被雷劈中》的评论。
这篇评论的作者分析称,参考特朗普在上次大选中的表现以及选情形势,2020年当选的可能性并不高。
因此,他用“一个地方两次被雷劈”的比喻,指代特朗普连任希望渺茫。

(《华尔街日报》发表的《特朗普要连任,除非一个地方两次被雷劈》)

如果说这就是一次话术上的调侃,倒也没多大事。
但是……这说法居然“应验”了。
当地时间10月22日凌晨2点,也就是这篇评论发表的30小时后。
三道雷同时击中了位于芝加哥的特朗普国际酒店(Trump International Hotel)。
你说一个地方雷击两次特朗普才能连任,现在劈了三次,怎么说?

(位于芝加哥的特朗普国际酒店遭三道雷击 来源:推特@ABC 7 Chicago)

也有不少人怀疑这事的真实性,这也太巧合了吧?
经检索,发布该消息的是芝加哥气象新闻频道ABC 7 Chicago,图片则由摄影师@Barry Butler拍摄。

特朗普的粉丝们激动了——还说一个地方雷劈两次什么不可能,你看老天多么配合咱们特朗普。
于是,他们纷纷搞起了迷信。
“简直就是上帝在投票!”

甚至有粉丝称,多亏特朗普酒店大厦引雷,才能保证普通人不被雷劈。
他甚至列出了数据:
“特朗普就任4年来,被雷劈的人数少了749%。”
虽然没有任何科学依据,但他坚持认为这都是特朗普的功劳。

至于特朗普的反对者,对这种貌似“天降异象”的情形,只能感到哭笑不得。
甚至开始质疑起了自己的宗教信仰:
“如果人类从一开始就没有‘发明’上帝该多好呢……”

当然,特朗普的反对者中虔诚的信教者则将这事解读为“上帝对特朗普的怒火”。
“你们特朗普粉丝懂宗教吗?人们说宗教上的雷击,那是上帝在对某人发火。”
“上帝没有让特朗普当选,人却做到了。”

玄学归玄学,事实上,特朗普国际酒店被雷劈好几次是正常现象。
原因是,像这种高层建筑物往往会被设计成安全吸引闪电并传导至大地的结构,以防建筑本体被破坏。
这也就是避雷针的工作原理。

可以说,这事就是特朗普的粉丝和反对者们都被自然现象给整上头了。

原文来源:观察者网
原文链接:https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id ... r=spider&for=pc

编辑:刘佳莹
179#
发表于 2020-12-2 20:08:25 | 只看该作者
【案例】




咱来看看美国人咋看大选的。
这是我下载的美网友对于大选是否作弊的评价,太多条了,不一一翻译。

他们中有挺川的,有反川的,有赞同司法调查的,也有认为舞弊说毫无根据的。但是,这么多条没有骂人的,没有互怼的,更没有歇斯底里发泄情绪的。

为什么?

VickiJax
6h ago
I don't care if it affected the outcome of the election, or not. If there was voter fraud, law abiding American voters have the right to know about, and those responsible need to be prosecuted.

Reply
2731
130

Show 128 previous replies

cyberpunk2077
VickiJax
53m ago
Oh Trump is going to jail for bribery

Reply

Mark_in_LV
VickiJax
55m ago
Of course. But these lawsuits are not even trying to prosecute anybody.  They're just trying to reverse an election result.

Reply
pfisher500
6h ago
It seems they are telling the team that they don't have standing BEFORE they even look at the evidence, how could you possibly establish whether there is standing or not without looking at some of the evidence?

Reply
1326
167

Show 107 previous replies

Mark_in_LV
pfisher500
56m ago
You clearly have no idea what "standing" means in a courtroom.

Reply

Tortuga6
pfisher500
1h ago
However, the so-called proof has not been presented during numerous court hearings, with judges repeatedly ruling against the Trump campaign in most of those states.”

So, Trump’s hand-picked Attorney General rejects allegations of fraud.

Trump’s Director of the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency rejects allegations of fraud.

Republican Governors in Ohio, Georgia, Arizona, and other states all reject allegations of fraud.
...See more

Reply
16
10

5headedmonster
pfisher500
2m ago
Haha "Team". Its just Rudy rummaging around in his trunk and asking himself, can I make this blow up doll learn to talk?

Reply
danielmaclean467
6h ago
Regardless of what happens, half of the nation no longer believes we have a free and fair election.

That's a serious problem that isn't going to go away.

Reply
1520
69

Show 46 previous replies

cyberpunk2077
danielmaclean467
53m ago
You’re not free because you’ve been convicted of a felony to defraud

Reply

JSchutt
danielmaclean467
1h ago
There is no proof of voter Fraud anywhere.    Trumps lawsuits have been lost.   The Recounts of paper ballots have all come out accurately.   Two Republican Senate committees appointed by Trump have found no fraud.   Trumps DOJ Barr has found no fraud.  Trumps Homeland security department found no fraud.      

Maybe it is time that we see that the Fraud is Trump.    And not our 240 year tradition of holding elections

Reply
27
22

Show 1 more replies

DigitalAddict
danielmaclean467
51m ago
Half the nation lacks the critical thinking to tell fact from fiction.  They believe whatever their favorite news site, Facebook feed, and megalomaniac leader tells them.  There is a reason spam email still works and looks like all the ads you see on Fox News.

Reply
davep375
5h ago
These allegations are possibly true but Trump has to prove it. Also, the evidence has to be substantial enough that it would affect the outcome of the election. That is an incredibly difficult hurdle to climb over. Trump has yet to provide hard physical evidence and judges don't want to hear about fraud. They want to see it.

Reply
283
48

Show 5 previous replies

HandyDandy
davep375
1h ago
The States run by criminal Democrats have the ballots in their possession.  Explain how Biden is losing big time, and comes back in 5 States with the same ratio of votes?  How does he get hundreds of thousands of votes in the middle of the night AFTER they stopped the count?

Reply
44
18
Show 2 more replies

RetiredLT‍
davep375
1h ago
I don't care if it affected the outcome of the election, or not. If there was voter fraud, law abiding American voters have the right to know about, and those responsible need to be prosecuted.

Reply
31
5

Show 2 more replies

deep44
5h ago
the issue those in Washington know full well if they investigate and find fraud which they will, their livelihoods will be taken away including all the ancillary businesses built around the political system.

Reply
288
45
1h ago
There is no proof of voter Fraud anywhere.    Trumps lawsuits have been lost.   The Recounts of paper ballots have all come out accurately.   Two Republican Senate committees appointed by Trump have found no fraud.   Trumps DOJ Barr has found no fraud.  Trumps Homeland security department found no fraud.      

Maybe it is time that we see that the Fraud is Trump.    And not our 240 year tradition of holding elections

Reply
10
11

Itsabigworld
deep44
2h ago
Ugh, you claim they will find fraud and they don’t. Trump claims there is fraud and cannot prove it. You see the lack of evidence, you see the court rulings, you hear the FBI and DoJ say there is no fraud, you hear judges and election officials including many republicans say there isno fraud, and you say.... there is evidence and they will find it. When are you going to make a reasoned assessment of what you see? Why do you continue to believe these lies in the face of all available evidence? When will you ever think “wait a minute, they’ve been lying to me”?

Reply
76
43

Show 1 more replies

Foxtv2260
6h ago
Perfect. These lawyers and their witnesses should appear in court and make their assertions of malfeasance to a judge.  Should be very interesting.

Reply
450
13

Show 6 previous replies

inscienceitrust
Foxtv2260
3h ago
to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”- Barr

Reply
45
53

Dennygirl
Foxtv2260
3h ago
No, the people they accuse should have to show they didn’t commit election fraud.

Reply
31
83

Show 7 more replies

cyberpunk2077
Foxtv2260
51m ago
That’s not going to happen because then the whistleblower would be testifying under oath and we all know they were paid

Reply
Debfortrump
5h ago
the fact that every day people have signed affidavits related to witnessing the mishandling of different aspects of the election tells me there is a real problem.  I heard alot of their statements and am appauled by what they witnessed.  I admire each one coming forward knowing full well that their lives will be disrupted for a period of time.  these every day folks want "every" American to know that there was some irregularities and that they should raise flags for this election cycle.  Americans do not want sloppy, illegal, dishonest elections.  every whistleblowers' statement should, without pause, be explored.

Reply
107
16

JSchutt
Debfortrump
1h ago
There is no proof of voter Fraud anywhere.    Trumps lawsuits have been lost.   The Recounts of paper ballots have all come out accurately.   Two Republican Senate committees appointed by Trump have found no fraud.   Trumps DOJ Barr has found no fraud.  Trumps Homeland security department found no fraud.      
Maybe it is time that we see that the Fraud is Trump.    And not our 240 year tradition of holding elections

Reply
6
9

Show 1 more replies

wot?
Debfortrump
5h ago
Fake News, and since you aren't a United States citizen, why don't you butt out of our elections.

Reply
15
36

cyberpunk2077
Debfortrump
51m ago
I don’t see republicans complaining about fraud in 2016 when Trump won ... right

Reply
kina
6h ago
I am deeply troubled by the phrase "not enough evidence" or the evidence is "not at the scale" to flip the results. A wrong act, a criminal act is enough to warrant an investigation. It's about the integrity of the election. Whether the fraud is big enough to change the election outcome is a different matter. And these people call themselves lawyers?

Reply
647
180

Show 25 previous replies

dwhatt
kina
1h ago
So true

Reply
2

Vantastic863
kina
3h ago
Yeah, it's kinda like saying, "He didn't aim well enough to hit anybody so there's no reason for the attempted murder charge."

Reply
5
1

5headedmonster
kina
8m ago
I'm sure your Trump University law degree has made you an authority. Get on the case Harvey Birdman

Reply
1

victoryhawk
5h ago
The only winner in the mail-in-ballot method of voting is the Postal service,  much needed revenue.  However the more I see and read about the system ( I was never a big fan ) I see too many problems  with  the mail-in-voting system. Absentee ballots sure, we need these but a system that some want to make a preferred method of voting , by mail is not the answer.
Reply
36
7

scubasteve191
5h ago
We received two mail in ballots for the previous homeowners, mother in law received a mail in ballot after moving to a different state after she already voted, and my spouse was told someone requested a mail in ballot on her behalf, without her knowledge, when she tried to vote at the polls.  This is such a small sample of what could have happened to many others.  Fraud or no fraud, there were flaws in the voting process this year that could have attributed to a candidate elected to an office position that didn’t receive legal votes.  There were too many inconsistencies this year not to question a fair election.

Reply
476
175

Show 14 previous replies

LibrariesAreCool
scubasteve191
3h ago
Riiiight. No complaints in 2016 however.

Reply
3
7

reconciled
scubasteve191
3h ago
First it's "there's no evidence whatsoever of any voter fraud"
Then "Well, there's no evidence of any significant voter fraud"
Then "Well, there's no evidence of widespread significant voter fraud"
Now it's "Well, there's no evidence of widespread significant voter fraud that could have changed 2020 election"
So we exposed their lie of "no evidence of any voter fraud" exposed their lie of "no significant voter fraud", exposed their lie of "no widespread significant voter fraud" and now we have to expose theiir final lie of "well .. not enough widespread significant voter fraud that could change the 2020 election" Not to mention he ignores the fact that the exposed massive widespread fraud puts all other house/Senate elections in jeopardy and Barr doesn't care and doesn't look into ANY of it, which exposes his criiminal attempt to cover it up, proving he's complicit in this massive fraud and must also be held accountable. They must have threatened Barr's life to get him to make such a blatant lie, either that or bought him off. Unfortunately for them, God is the one that ordains all leaders, and seems to me likely God is not ordaining Biden/democrats via all this treason to take over America, but instead showing America how easily our country can be taken down from within if we do not get back to Him.

Reply
21
16



作者:青青




编辑:王雅欣

180#
发表于 2021-5-20 22:36:41 | 只看该作者

【案例】


新闻界要求调查以色列“战争罪”


参考消息网518日报道 外媒称,“无国界记者”组织16日要求国际刑事法院判定以色列轰炸加沙地带一座多家媒体所在的大楼是否构成战争罪。


据法新社巴黎516日报道,以色列在此前的空袭中将贾拉塔大厦夷为平地,卡塔尔半岛电视台和美联社等多家媒体在这座大楼办公。以色列国防部官员称,这座大楼内不仅有媒体机构,还有控制加沙地带的伊斯兰主义组织哈马斯的办公室。


但“无国界记者”组织秘书长克里斯托夫·德卢瓦尔在声明中说:“故意袭击媒体机构构成战争罪。以色列国防军蓄意摧毁媒体,不仅造成了不可接受的物质损失,进一步说,他们是在阻挠媒体报道一场直接加害于平民的冲突。”


声明说:“我们呼吁国际刑事法院的检察官确定以色列的空袭是否构成战争罪。”


另据美联社华盛顿516日报道,美联社执行主编16日呼吁对以色列摧毁媒体所在大楼的空袭展开独立调查,称公众有权了解事实。


美联社执行主编萨莉·布兹比说,以色列政府尚未提供支持此次袭击的明确证据。


她说,美联社在这栋大楼办公已有15年,从未听说或发现有任何迹象表明哈马斯可能在楼内。她说,以色列方面必须摆出事实。


此外据法新社华盛顿516日报道,以色列总理内塔尼亚胡16日为袭击加沙地带的一栋有多家媒体的建筑辩护。


内塔尼亚胡在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻部采访时说:“这是我们得到的情报。一个巴勒斯坦恐怖组织情报办公室在这栋建筑内,该组织策划并组织针对以色列平民的恐怖袭击。因此,这是一个完全合法的目标。”



来源:和讯网

链接:http://news.hexun.com/2021-05-18/203618230.html

编辑:李佳怿


发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 实名注册

本版积分规则

掌上论坛|小黑屋|传媒教育网 ( 蜀ICP备16019560号-1

Copyright 2013 小马版权所有 All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2016-2022 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表